Talk:Main Page - Revision history

FrYGuY at 16:56, 16 January 2006

2006-01-16T16:56:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 16 January 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)		I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)
	[~~http~~:~~//northwestairlines.bravehost.com Northwest Airlines~~]
			Awesome! I also see I am now a sysop, which means I can delete all the spammed talk pages flat out, and ban the spammers too. At least I'll be less frustrated, being able to ban the spammers... ban ban ban the spammers! Wee! -[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 10:56, 16 January 2006 (CST)

Serginandr at 06:37, 6 January 2006

2006-01-06T06:37:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 6 January 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Regular vandalism ==		== Regular vandalism ==

	I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)

	I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)

	That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)		That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)

	I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)		I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)
			[http://northwestairlines.bravehost.com Northwest Airlines]

Dcat: /* Regular vandalism */

2006-01-06T02:40:13Z

Regular vandalism

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 6 January 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)		That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)

			I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)

FrYGuY: /* Regular vandalism */

2005-12-29T08:56:59Z

Regular vandalism

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 29 December 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:

	I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)

			That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)

Dcat at 22:24, 28 December 2005

2005-12-28T22:24:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 28 December 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)

			I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)

FrYGuY: /* Regular vandalism */

2005-12-28T09:30:25Z

Regular vandalism

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 28 December 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Regular vandalism ==		== Regular vandalism ==

	I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have ~~an account~~ have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)

FrYGuY: Admins, we need to talk...

2005-12-28T09:29:58Z

Admins, we need to talk...

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 28 December 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.		In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.

			== Regular vandalism ==

			I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have an account have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)

FrYGuY: Reverting vandalism... again...

2005-12-28T09:20:26Z

Reverting vandalism... again...

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:20, 28 December 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.		In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.





























































	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/phentermine/ phentermine]~~
	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/discount-phentermine/ discount-phentermine]~~
	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/phentermine-online/ phentermine-online]~~
	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/cheap-phentermine/ cheap-phentermine]~~
	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/buy-phentermine/ buy-phentermine]~~
	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/order-phentermine/ order-phentermine]~~
	~~[http://celika.dynu.net/online-pharmacy/diflucan.html diflucan]~~

Mark1985 at 18:21, 26 December 2005

2005-12-26T18:21:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 26 December 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.		In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.





























































			[http://celika.dynu.net/phentermine/ phentermine]
			[http://celika.dynu.net/discount-phentermine/ discount-phentermine]
			[http://celika.dynu.net/phentermine-online/ phentermine-online]
			[http://celika.dynu.net/cheap-phentermine/ cheap-phentermine]
			[http://celika.dynu.net/buy-phentermine/ buy-phentermine]
			[http://celika.dynu.net/order-phentermine/ order-phentermine]
			[http://celika.dynu.net/online-pharmacy/diflucan.html diflucan]

Escar: wizard wish list

2005-12-20T01:16:12Z

wizard wish list

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 20 December 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Very intresting wiki site!... Thanx! --[[User:HarryRens\|HarryRens]] 15:25, 15 Oct 2005 (CDT)		Very intresting wiki site!... Thanx! --[[User:HarryRens\|HarryRens]] 15:25, 15 Oct 2005 (CDT)
	It's a very good site !! Very nice work, admin :) Good luck !		It's a very good site !! Very nice work, admin :) Good luck !

			== wizard wish list ==

			In trying to wander the maze of adding G2 or edonkey why o why isnt there a wizard [in my dreams]. Just musing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 6 January 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Regular vandalism ==		== Regular vandalism ==

	I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I've had to clean up Wiki vandalizing bots numerous times, and I doubt it'll stop unless something is done to prevent them from working here... the EASIEST way would be to have any new accounts have a 1 hour "cooldown" time where the user is notified that it'll be X minutes until they can post, in order to stop rampant automated vandalism for page rank... Also nice would be a way to revert all edits by somebody (If they're adding random sex and pharmaceutical links to one page, I doubt they'll be adding useful contribution to anything else). While I'm doing random christmas lists (Hey, 'tis the season, just a tad late!), I'd like to be able to stab them in the face over the internet. I'm aware that last one is quite difficult, so I understand if you pass on trying it. Still, even if the first two ideas are rejected for whatever reason, SOME measure would be nice... --[[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 03:29, 28 December 2005 (CST)

	I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)		I don't really want to take on the job of developing Mediawiki. That's their job. I installed the SpamBlacklist extension but that doesn't seem to catch all of it. Any suggestions you have on taming the spam should be directed to the Mediawiki developers. Also these links are useless for spammers and quite harmless. Many search engines now respect the "nofollow" attribute which is attached to all external links. If there's any other features I can install or enable then please let me know. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 16:24, 28 December 2005 (CST)

	That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)		That's understandable... At least being an admin with the power to ban them would be nice, or at least seeing them get banned by somebody who IS an admin... wink wink nudge nudge... [[User:FrYGuY\|FrYGuY]] 02:56, 29 December 2005 (CST)

	I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)		I took another look through all the available settings and found a rate limiting feature. Different categories of users can be limited to X edits in Y amount of seconds. One of the groups is called "newbie" which is apparently any account that was created recently. I set it to 1 edit per 120 seconds. We'll see what happens. --[[User:Dcat\|Dcat]] 20:40, 5 January 2006 (CST)
			[http://northwestairlines.bravehost.com Northwest Airlines]